KPNX, Arizona Republic still Apologizing for Scottsdale Police Killing Sgt. Prostrollo

Something still stinks in Scottsdale. But now it is now the stench of death and corruption faintly perfumed over by Scottsdale Police media apologists. In the never ending media rush to defend Scottsdale Police department's unlawful killing of Sgt. Prostrollo, the media conglomerate of Arizona Republic and KPNX has proclaimed yet another defense of Scottsdale Police. First there was Ofelia Madrid's abysmal "reporting", then there were tedious and worthless commentaries by EJ Montini and Laurie Roberts. Now there is the story above by Chris Hrapsky.

Mr. Hrapsky never asked Sgt. Mark Clark why did Scottsdale Police issue a press release that claimed it was too windy to use a taser or pepper spray when not a single officer on the scene said that was the case. Mr. Hrapsky, if you read this post, then I suggest you reread the police reports. Not one officer claimed it was too windy for non-lethal force. Mr. Hrapsky never asked why did Det. Lockerby of Scottsdale Police internal affairs spoon feed the answer "too windy" to the officers the day after the shooting. He never asked why did Scottsdale Police show more concern for their canine than Sgt. Prostrollo. Mr. Hrapsky never bothered to go the national weather service website, which would have taken all of two minutes, to find out the night of the shooting wind was average, and confront Sgt. Clark with that fact.

I am so dissappointed with the KPNX story for the following reason: if local media had been more interested in actual investigation of the Prostrollo shooting, maybe then John Loxas would still be alive. 

Of course, there is also Sgt. Clark's "cookie cutter" defense and his informal, casual, and quarter-hearted condolence to Mr. Prostrollo "we get it".  

Officers are trained to confront the situation that's presented to them. So to say that there is one cookie cutter approach for a specific situation, you can't do that... We understand that Mr. Prostrollo is upset... we get that... 

How on Earth Sgt. Clark is still the public information officer for Scottsale Police is beyond me, but it speaks volumes about the Scottsdale Police administration that he still has that job. If, Sgt. Clark, Scottsdale Police "get it", why did SPD lie about the wind? Why did the Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police slander Sgt. Prostrollo and humiliate his friends? Why did Scottsdale police show more concern for a dog than Sgt. Prostrollo? 

I can almost imagine the following conversation taking place at Scottsdale Police Headquarters: 

Chief Rodbell: dude, guess what? Rambo's old man is totally bummed, and guess what bro?  

Sgt. Clark: No way, bro, what? 

Rodbell: the old man is suing us for freakin' killing his kid! Totally a bummer cuz our dog almost bit it.

Sgt. Clark: no way!! someone, should like, you know, tell him 'hey dude, chill bro', we like totally 'get it'. Ya know, it was like, totally too windy and gnarly. Ya know, what we do ain't cookie cutter. 

For some background information on this topic, see my posts on Scottsdale Police, Sgt. Jason Prostrollo, and John Loxas

UPDATE: For some very good news, the Prostrollo family filed a notice of claim against the City of Scottsdale seeking $5,000,000. You can see the notice here at NOTICE OF CLAIM.pdf The family hired Robbins and Curtain for the lawsuit, which is excellent news as I know that both Mr. Robbins and Mr. Curtain are excellent attorneys. 

While personal injury attorneys get a lot of grief for a variety of reasons, this is a perfect example of an attorney suing in the pursuit of justice. I hope and pray that Mr. Curtain and Mr. Robbins succeed in their pursuit of justice, that the Prostrollo family gets some relief, and the Scottsdale Police Department learns the error of their ways.  Maybe, after all is said and done, Scottsdale police will finally learn they can't kill unarmed civilians and lie their way out of trouble.

Finally, I was reading through the police reports of this case, and I saw Det. Lockerby's report. This is signficant because he was the internal affairs officer in charge of the investigation:

Offender threatened to commit Aggravated Assault with pool cue sticks against listed Scottsdale PoliceOfficers while at 12074 North 135th Place in Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona. Listed Offender was shot and killed by Lt. Ron Bayne #559 while committing the Aggravated Assault.  

So, I ask again, if this is the official Internal Affairs summary of what happened and why Lt. Bayne killed Sgt. Prostrollo, what wind?

Officer Chong Kim, Lt. Ron Bayne, and Scottsdale Police Internal Affairs: An Unholy Trinity?

I just received the internal affairs file from Scottsdale Police for former officer Chong Kim. See "Scottsdale pays woman $315K in police strip-search incident": 

Scottsdale has agreed to pay a woman $315,000 as compensation for being wrongfully strip-searched last year inside her apartment by a city police officer who subsequently resigned.

Officer Chong Kim resigned in June 2008 after he was questioned about the incident by police internal-affairs investigators...

According to internal police documents, Kim admitted that he improperly searched the 19-year-old woman after she called police to her apartment for help.

The internal affairs file of the investigation is available here chong kim internal affairs 002.pdf. There are a couple of interesting points with regard to this investigation.

First, the supervising Scottsdale Police internal affairs officer who investigated Ofc. Chong Kim is none other than the same officer who shot and killed Sgt. Jason Prostrollo, Lt. Ron Bayne. Of course, Scottsdale Police internal affairs "investigated" Lt. Bayne after he killed Sgt. Prostrollo. In other words, in Scottsdale the police literally police the police. That this is an incestuous conflict of interest is obvious. What real incentive does Scottsdale PD internal affairs have to properly investigate officer misconduct when they know the officer they are investigating may very well one day be doing the very same to them?

Second, a former Scottsdale Police officer told me that during this same internal affairs investigation that not only did Officer Chong Kim admit to the allegations contained in the civil complaint against him, but he also admitted to have sex with an underage female.

During the IA investigation, Ofc. Kim not only admitted to having acted in the same manner in some 15-20 incidents; but, also admitted to having sex with an underage female. The legal and moral obligation of the IA detectives was to stop the interview and to turn the investigation over to the sex crime unit detectives (as anything that is revealed to IA cannot be used to charge the officer criminally in a court of law).

There is no mention, however, of that putative admission in the internal affairs file. Did he actually confess to felony sexual misconduct and Scottsdale PD is covering it up? I asked Scottsdale Police that question on twitter:

@scottsdalepd was a sex crimes detective brought in for Ofc Kim's internal affairs interview? If not why not.

.@ScottsdalePD Did Ofc Chong Kim admit to child molestation during an internal affairs interrogation?

I have not received any response back to either of these two tweets. If you are concerned about the incestuous nature of Scottsdale police internal affairs or the possibility they are covering up officer crimes, tweet them and ask them the same questions I did. 

According to news reports, Scottsdale PD turned over the Ofc. Kim investigation to the FBI. However, I did not find anything online that Ofc. Kim was ever prosecuted in state or federal court. And even if Scottsdale PD did turn over the putative criminal investigation over to the FBI, that does not excuse, if true, Scottsdale PD from learning everything they needed to from Ofc. Kim before ended the interrogation. Did he confess or was he about to, but Scottsdale PD cut him off to protect both him and themselves? If this interrogation was recorded, which it should have been, then I think it's time Scottsdale PD released it. 

I believe the former Scottsdale Officer is credible as he told me personally about Officer James Peters penchant for slamming on his brakes while a prisoner is in the backseat so the prisoner will hit the cage divider. He told me this a couple of weeks before Scottsdale PD released Officer Peters' internal affairs file and the media reported the same incident ("Personnel files released of officer involved in 6 deadly shootings".  

His superiors said in August of that year, he and a trainee were transporting a handcuffed prisoner in the backseat of a patrol car. While on the freeway, the suspension letter said his trainee sped on the freeway, braking several times and causing the prisoner to strike the cage divider in the car. The report called it an excessive use of force, saying that he did not do anything to stop the trainee.

It's Time for Ofelia Madrid and EJ Montini to go

The Arizona Republic has failed us miserably. It is the largest and most prestigious news organization in Arizona, and if it had minimally competent journalists and commentators working for it, at least one man would still be alive. That man is John Loxas. 

After Scottsdale Police killed Jason Prostrollo, I made the obvious point that if no one held Scottsdale Police accountable, his sad death would not be the last one. A short two weeks later, as everyone else is aware, Scottsdale Police killed John Loxas. In between the two shootings, Ms. Madrid, the Arizona Republic public safety reporter covering Scottsdale simply repeated Scottsdale Police press releases back to her readers. She could have saved everyone the trouble and just given Sgt. Mark Clark, the Scottsdale PD spokesperson, the by line on her stories.

After the Loxas shooting, Ms. Madrid did the exact same thing yet again. But even worse, she made it seem as if it was her own story, thereby giving the story the credibility of an independent investigation (from my comments on twitter):

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral Plz tell me you are going to do more than just repeat what @scottsdalePD tells you back to us

.@ofeliamadrid Will reporters ask SPD basic questions (ie, investigate) or just repeat SPD's statement word for word to the public?

Plz someone, anyone ask @scottsdalepd why No TASER!!

@KimRSchofield even worse the poor question reporters were asking at the PR conference. That's why SPD gets away with this behavior

@ofeliamadrid @azcentral If gun found in "lunge area" why 2hrs ago SPD said no gun recovered? anyone bother to ask SPD that question?

Wonderful how local media falls over backwards to exonerate/congratulate police who shoot 2 kill.

I take it from local media coverage of police shootings they are terrified of upsetting @scottsdalePD

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral "Search warrant"?? why would @scottsdalePD have needed a search warrant for? that smells really rotten

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral is @scottsdalePD saying he was shot and dropped the gun or didn't have it when shot? did you ask SPD that?

@kinseyschofield @KFisher15 I hate to say it, but local media doesn't care or is scared. S.Cal doing much better on Loggins shooting

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral Did you ask why no taser or dog used?

And when Scottsdale PD finally released the Prostrollo police reports, she simply cut and pasted the police reports as her story. She only added the obvious point about wind not being an issue after I criticized her on twitter (her replies to me start with Ofelia Madrid and my direct replies to her start Vladimir Gagic):

.@azcentral if I want to apply for a job, can I just cut and paste someone else's resume? Thats how ur reporters get write their stories

@kinseyschofield @ofeliamadrid @scottsdalepd "in love" with cutting and pasting police reports and making it her story. Cushy job...

Working for @azcentral would be super easy. All I would do is cut and paste from police reports like this one story http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/02/21/20120221scottsdale-police-officer-report-outlines-fatal-shot-fired.html

Am I the only person who thinks that some members of media are either too close or too scared of law enforcement to report accurately?

Ofelia Madrid ‏ @ofeliamadrid @vlga Of course.If you're read my response to you, I said, several officers mentioned that it was windy. I didn't add the rest about Tasers

Vladimir Gagic ‏ @vlga.@ofeliamadrid Most important part of shooting is @scottsdalepd blatantly lied about why they had to kill him. How you don't see that...

@ofeliamadrid Don't you think its important @scottsdalePD said 2 windy for taser but no officer does?? how does that not make ur story?

Ofelia Madrid ‏ @ofeliamadrid@vlga Actually several officers mentioned windy conditions that night. Here's the report if you want to read it: tinyurl.com/8yg8gcv

Vladimir Gagic ‏ @vlga.@ofeliamadrid I hope u understand diff b'w "too windy" to use taser and "it was windy", which was spoon fed to them by IA afterwards

@ofeliamadrid I've read it many times. NOT ONE OFFICER said it was too windy to use taser or pepper spray. You should reread the report.

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral Why didn't you mention @scottsdalePD said it was "too windy" to use taser, but that excuse not in report?

Even then, her paragraph regarding the wind was pathetic. She did not even check it for grammar as she had a comma separating two independent clauses. 

.@ofeliamadrid @azcentral wrote the lame, timid paragraph re wind in a rush and b4 proof reading? ; b4 "however" not ,

Mr. Montini's commentary was just as bad. It is obvious to me his days as Arizona's progressive voice are long gone. Either he is terrified of offending law enforcement, or he actually believes police never lie. Either way, it is time for both Mr. Montini and Ms. Madrid to go; maybe that way we can a police force that actually "protects and serves", and even more importantly, local law enforcement will finally know hunting season of unarmed civilians is over. 

For a clear example of the point I am making, compare the NC Times commentary "Shameful Acts in the OC" regarding the shooting of Sgt. Manuel Loggins Jr. and Mr. Montini's lame commentary "Marine, vet, patriot ... and threat".

And watch the video below to see what a motivated reporter can actually accomplish. If only we had someone...

Continue Reading

Jason Prostrollo Police Reports Finally Released

The police reports from the shooting of Sgt. Jason Prostrollo are available at prostrollo reports.pdf 

A couple things I noticed: 

1) No one was saying it was too windy to use a taser. The wind only became an issue after Scottsdale Police Internal Affairs started spoon feeding that answer to the officers. 

2) See the following conversation between Det. Lockerby of internal affairs and Lt. Bayne, the shooting officer, and tell me if it sounds like Lt. Bayne was convinced he had to shoot:

Det Lockerby:...you know, what we got this and it's clear and consise. What do you think he would've done with- with- the oh- objects that he had, the sticks and whatever he had in his position, what do you think would've happened to the officers if you didin't take- the deadly force action? 

Lt. Bayne: Well, I- I don't know what...

UPDATE:

On the Sgt. Manuel Loggins Jr. shooting, the Marine Corp is proving why "Always Faithful" is more than just a slogan and why they are different from any other service. "Camp Pendleton Base Officials Take City, County to Task on Handling of Shooting" See the letter Camp Pendleton released here. There was also a news report that the Marine Corp is less than satisfied in the District Attorney's office and that NCIS is conducting their own independent investigation. Sgt. Loggins was shot by OC deputy Darren Sandberg.

John Loxas Murdered by Scottsdale Police, From 'Protect and Serve' to 'Get Some'

"Don't be misled, dangerous people walk the streets of Scottsdale", says the Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police. I completely agree, they carry badges and shoot to kill.

The Scottsdale Police Department is on the warpath against its own citizens, and the latest victim of the Scottsdale war machine is a 50 year old grandfather, John Loxas ("Cop Shoots Man Holding Baby: James Loxas Killed In Phoenix" by Bob Christie): 

Several officers called for him to come outside, but Loxas refused, Rodbell said.[James] Peters shot Loxas in the head with a scope-equipped rifle from about 15 yards away when he leaned over and reached inside the house. Loxas died instantly, and fell with the baby in his arms, police spokesman Sgt. Mark Clark said. The baby was unhurt.

According to witnesses, Scottsdale Police officers were celebrating and loudly cheering after the kill shot. When Ofc. Peters shot Mr. Loxas, Mr. Loxas had no weapon, was turning away from officers to walk back into the home, and probably was setting his grandson down as the reports say he was lowering the child from around his head to the lower right side of his body. In other words, when Ofc. Peters shot and killed Mr. Loxas, Mr. Loxas was not an imminent physical threat to anyone, not police, not his grandson, not anyone. 

Police have no more right to use physical or deadly force than anyone else, and if this had been an ordinary citizen, I am almost certain he would be facing first degree murder charges. Anyone who encouraged him or assisted him, like other police officers at the scene or in command perhaps, should be charged as well with murder as accomplices, maybe even conspiracy to commit murder. 

Intentionally killing without justification and with premeditation is first degree murder. Motive is irrelevant. The fact these officers will claim they were only killed Mr. Loxas to save the life of his grandson is irrelevant. In the eyes of more than a thousand years of common law, that motive is no different from killing to steal someone's car. 

The officer who shot Mr. Loxas has quite a history; he has killed 6 people in his illustrious career. Of course, the Scottsdale Police department and County Attorney has justified all of them. But does anyone really believe that means all 6 of those victims should be dead and there might not have been a better, less lethal resolution? 

At the very least, I would like Scottsdale Police answer the following questions:

1) Why no taser used? Was it too windy? Why no dog? And please Sgt. Mark Clark, no "holier than thou" how dare you even ask that question. Not a single officer said Mr. Loxas had a weapon when Ofc. Peters killed him. Why is Scottsdale PD throwing around the fact Ofc. Peters was a "veteran" like they did in the Sgt. Prostrollo shooting? Why should that matter? 

2) Why did Scottsdale PD say at the first press conference at 11 am, some 12 hours after the shooting and after the search warrant had already been executed, that "no gun was recovered", but only a couple of hours later claim Mr. Loxas had a gun within "lunge distance" and his home was loaded like an armory?

3) Why is Scottsdale PD smearing Mr. Loxas with cheap shots like about how dirty his house was, that CPS had been called, that he has mental problems, and why are they telling the world that on the 911 call a neighbor advised Mr. Loxas might need to be shot? What does that have to do with anything other than slurs to defend Scottsdale PD's action by the lowest means available?  

4) This one really stinks: why did they say at the first press conference only one officer out of 6 saw something in Mr. Loxas' hands, but now that number is 2, including Ofc. Peters standing 18 feet away while looking through a scope centered on Mr. Loxas' head? And what did they claim they saw? Does anyone actually think any  officer really believes he saw something in Mr. Loxas' hands? That is rotten. 

5) Finally, did Scottsdale PD command bring in Ofc. Peters to take a kill shot? Was that why he was on the scene? A reporter essentially asked Sgt. Mark Clark that question yesterday at the afternoon press conference, and Sgt. Clark refused to answer the question in front of cameras.  If Mr. Loxas was an imminent threat, why did only Ofc. Peters, one among 6 officers, shoot and kill? Wouldn't all the officers have seen the same exact thing and reacted the same? 

I am not optimistic. Scottsdale Police is acting as if they are untouchable, and so far they are right. Their behavior reminds of the helicopter gunner from Full Metal Jacket

GET SOME..Yeah, Yeah, GET SOME, Baby. Anyone who runs is a VC; anyone who stands still is a well-disciplined VC. 

Do you ever shoot women and children?

Sometimes.

How can you shoot women and children?

Easy, you just don't lead them so much, Hah, ain't war hell!

To see Officer James Peters Internal Affairs file, go here: James Peters personnel file.pdf

Sgt. Manuel Loggins Jr., Another Unarmed Marine Shot and Killed by Police

Another day, another Marine killed by police. First, Tucson SWAT killed Jose Guerena (please read the excellent story called "Jose Guerena Killed: Arizona Cops Shoot Former Marine In Botched Pot Raid" by Radley Balko): 

One of those homes belonged to 26-year-old Jose Guerena and his wife, Vanessa Guerena. The couple's 4-year-old son was also in the house at the time...

As the SWAT team forced its way into his home, Guerena, a former Marine who served two tours of duty in Iraq, armed himself with his AR-15 rifle and told his wife and son to hide in a closet. As the officers entered, Guerena confronted them from the far end of a long, dark hallway. The police opened fire, releasing more than 70 rounds in about 7 seconds, at least 60 of which struck Guerena.

Note that Mr. Guerena was completely innocent of any criminal activity and did not fire his weapon: 

The Pima County Sheriff's Department initially claimed Guerena fired his weapon at the SWAT team. They now acknowledge that not only did he not fire, the safety on his gun was still activated when he was killed. Guerena had no prior criminal record, and the police found nothing illegal in his home.

Then Scottsdale PD killed Sgt. Jason Prostrollo, lied about why had to kill him, and if that was not enough, tarnished his honor after the fact and belittled friends who cared about him

Now, it has happened yet again; police have shot and killed yet another unarmed Marine. This time an Orange County Deputy shot and killed Sgt. Manuel Loggins ("RIP Sgt. Manuel Loggins Jr. of the Marines. Killed by the police, unarmed and in front of his children"): 

A veteran Orange County sheriff’s deputy (claims/lied that) he feared for the safety of two young girls sitting in a parked car when he shot and killed a Marine sergeant in a dark parking lot near San Clemente High School, authorities said Friday.

Sgt. Manuel Loggins Jr. was shot early Tuesday as he started to get into the SUV where his two daughters -- 9 and 14 -- were sitting, authorities said. Jim Amormino, a spokesman for the department, said the deputy was fearful that Loggins -- who he said (supposedly) appeared to be acting irrationally -- was about to drive off with the girls.

The Tenth Generation Patriot hit the nail on the head: 

The cop, who was "doing paperwork", was probably really sleeping on the job. He woke up at the sound of an accident at his "safe hide", and sleepy and confused, shot this Marine. His confusion still apparent, he made up a story about "feeling Threatened". Later, when told his story wouldn't wash, he made up a new one, when someone told him, "For Christs sake, his kids were in the back seat!"

Police officers are acting like a badge is a license to kill. But the law for police officers is exactly the same as any other person: you can only shoot to kill to protect yourself or others from an imminent physical threat. Period.

A friend of mine who used to be a federal agent in Southern California told me that police departments in California are much better at weeding out trigger happy police officers than Arizona police departments. Let's hope that's true, and let's hope the Orange County Sheriff's Department provides a model to local law enforcement, i.e. Scottsdale PD, of what a true and complete investigation is all about. 

One note of comparison is immediately noteworthy. Southern California media is not terrified of doing its job and is not falling over backwards to congratulate and exonerate the deputy who killed Sgt. Loggins. I hope our local media (for example, E.J. Montini) heeds that lesson as well. 

Did Jim Nolan, President of Scottsdale Police Union, Do the Right Thing by Embarrassing Sen John McCain?

Solidarity is under siege. Austerity has laid waste to the vestiges of labor rights.  That sad fact is no where else more true than in Arizona. As Braham Resnick writes ("Sweeping bills attack public employee unions"):

Arizona's Republican Legislature could virtually wipe out public employee unions in a sweeping new package of legislation far broader than the collective-bargaining bills that shut down Wisconsin's Capitol last spring. The bills would:

-Make it illegal for government bodies to collectively bargain with employee groups. Public safety unions (police officer unions) would be included in the ban.

-End the practice of automatic payroll deductions for union dues.

-Ban compensation of public employees for union work.

In the middle of this anti-labor firestorm, the president of the Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police, Jim Nolan, thought it wise to provoke and embarrass one of the most powerful men on Earth, and certainly the most powerful Arizona politician in the past 50 years: Sen. John McCain.  

This, of course, happened after Sen McCain's wife tweeted that Sgt. Jason Prostrollo (the unarmed former Marine who Scottsdale Police killed): "RIP Jason Prostrollo. You are a patriot and a veteran." In response to the that tweet, Mr. Nolan wrote a polemic directed at Mrs. McCain; she then deleted that tweet.  

While I have not seen the entire letter, I can only imagine, from the paragraph I did see, that it was hardly diplomatic or refined. And while Mr. Nolan may have won the battle by having Mrs. McCain delete her tweet, how costly was the victory for the bargaining rights of Arizona's workers? 

I agree with almost none of Sen. McCain's politics, but I have no doubt that he loves his wife and his children, and I certainly have no doubt that he is a proud man. Undoubtedly, no one who has accomplished what Sen. McCain has is soft or timid. I was at Sgt. Prostrollo's funeral and Mrs. McCain's eulogy was loving, genuine, and tender. It was as if she lost her own son. Her tears were real. She is now a wounded lioness, and that wrath will almost certainly be redeemed by Sen. McCain one way or the other.  

The best advice I ever received was never yell at a waiter for the simple reason you don't know he will do to your food when you are not looking. Sen. McCain doesn't have to stump in support of Gov. Brewer's anti-labor plan. He can do all the damage he needs to behind the scenes, with a couple of phone calls here and there. He can sway on-the-fence legislatures and none of us will ever know.  

But he's a outspoken Republican so wouldn't he do that anyway? Maybe, but maybe not. The point is not that he was fervent supporter of Solidarity before Sgt. Prostrollo was shot and killed, just that he was silent and seemingly uninterested. Now that could very well change, not because he is more interested in the raw policy implications, but because his wife has been humiliated. He could still stay silent, but behind the scenes be very dangerous to Arizona public collective bargaining rights.

What Mr. Nolan thought he could gain, other than to blast "March of Valkyries" and repeat to himself endlessly "smells like victory", by embarrassing Sen. McCain and his wife, I can't even begin to imagine. If I didn't know any better, I would have thought Mr. Nolan was an agent provocateur planted by the Goldwater Institute.

It may be wise for all union members in Arizona to ask themselves whether Mr. Nolan has the right temperament and judgment for leadership. Is his "bull in a china shop" attitude really such a good idea? Does brow-beating Cindy McCain, whose only sin was to show love for a friend, make even the least bit of sense?  

If you are a Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police member, ask yourself this question: 20 years from now when you about to retire, what will be more important to you, that Mr. Nolan selfishly stared down Cindy McCain and won, or that you will have a decent pension and health care benefits?  If your pension is more important to you than Mr. Nolan's pride, then maybe its time someone took his place and immediately, while it's not too late, apologized to Mrs. McCain. Maybe that way, the political behemoth that is Sen. McCain will stay on the sidelines. 

Why Won't Scottsdale Police Release Sgt. Prostrollo Police Reports? The Death of a Young Marine

Something is rotten in Scottsdale. Despite a state law that requires Scottsdale Police to release reports from the Jason Prostrollo shooting, Scottsdale PD refuses to release them: 

Mr. Gagic,

Our intention is to release what we can publicly per ARS 39-121. We are currently reviewing the documents with our detectives and the County Atty's Office to make sure that we are releasing all of the available documents as soon as possible. As soon as they are available we will let you know.

Officer David Pubins Scottsdale Police Department

While it may sound as if Scottsdale Police is merely trying to be responsible, I believe differently: they are stonewalling and circling the wagons; in other words, the thin blue line is forming.

ARS 39-121 does not give Scottsdale Police the option to hold off on releasing the police parts or only parts of it. It must be released to the public. Second, it is very disturbing that Sgt. Mark Clark, the very same Mark Clark who released a press statement that it was "too windy to use taser or pepper spray", has authority in determining the release of the police reports.  That to me is a clear conflict of interest as it would very much be to his benefit to deflect blame.  

The bottom line is I have no faith in Scottsdale Police properly investigating Sgt. Prostrollo's shooting. 

I would like to see the following done: 

1) An outside agency should investigate Scottsdale Police. The best agency for this would be the Arizona Department of Public Safety. I have no doubt they would conduct a full and truthful investigation, and there is a facebook page called "Justice for Jason Prostrollo" dedicated to this point. At the very least, Sgt. Mark Clark should have absolutely no role in determing the when and how of the police report release.

2) A truthful investigation into criminal charges- at least manslaughter- not only against the officer who shot Sgt. Prostrollo, but also obstruction of justice charges against any Scottsdale officer who may participated in concealing evidence regarding the shooting. Also, if it turns out Sgt. Mark Clark should have known better than to issue a false press statement, he should be severely sanctioned as well.

3) I really hope the Prostrollo family sues the city of Scottsdale. This is not just about uncovering the facts regarding the shooting and punishing anyone who may have been responsible, this is about preventing this sort of thing from happening again. This about changing the Scottsdale police culture from "shoot first" and "cover up afterwards". The only way that will happen is by hitting Scottsdale where it hurts: in the pocketbook.

If this case ends without a civil complaint and criminal charges only (any criminal charges is big assumption in any event), that will not motivate the Scottsdale administration to weed out trigger-happy cowboys. Without a civil complaint, Scottsdale will only say this shooting was sui generis and all the bad apples have been caught and punished.  But if the Scottsdale budget takes a hit, that will motivate them to make sure this never happens again. 

Below is the contact information for the Scottsdale Police administration. Ask them why are they refusing to release Sgt. Prostrollo's police reports? 

Sergeant Mark Clark

Public Information Supervisor

480-312-1910

Email: pio@scottsdaleaz.gov

Officer Dave Pubins

Public Information Officer

480-312-1911

Email: pio@scottsdaleaz.gov

You can also contact these assistant chiefs and demand answers.

John Cocca, Assistant Chief, Uniformed Services Bureau

Phone: (480) 312-1904

Email: jcocca@scottsdaleaz.gov

Sean Duggan, Assistant Chief, Personnel Development/

Investigative Services Bureau

Phone: (480) 312-1906

Email: sduggan@scottsdaleaz.gov

UPDATE: 

Two days ago (Feb 14, 2012), I emailed Scottsdale Police asking for a status of the reports. They have not bothered emailing me back. I guess they have been very busy lately, see "John Loxas Murdered by Scottsdale Police, From 'Protect and Serve' to 'Get Some'"

Is Scottsdale Police Lying About Killing Jason Prostrollo? The Death of a Young Marine

Scottsdale Police killed a former Recon Marine armed only with a pool stick ("Man killed by Scottsdale police was former Marine" by Ofelia Madrid of the Arizona Republic): 

Prostrollo worked in reconnaissance as a sergeant in the Marines and was discharged two years ago, said Prostrollo's father, Warren Prostrollo of Paradise Valley... 

When officers arrived, the residents came out of the house unharmed and Prostrollo came out moments later with a pool cue in each hand, police said. Prostrollo was holding the cues in a threatening manner and ignored commands to drop the cues and stop walking, police said. A K-9 officer released his dog, Raider, which bit Prostrollo but didn't stop him from continuing to advance toward officers. 

Scottsdale police Lt. Ron Bayne shot Prostrollo and killed him.

According to Scottsdale Police spokesman Mark Clark "A Taser or pepper spray was not used because of the windy conditions that morning" and, Lt. Bayne, the officer who killed Jason Prostrollo was a "19 year veteran". 

I find the Scottsdale Police Department's version of events very difficult to believe. First, according to weather reports, at 4 am wind in Scottsdale was approximately between 8 and 6 mph. That is hardly windy and is average for Scottsdale; Scottsdale is the city with the 21st lowest wind speed in the United States (average yearly wind in Scottsdale is 6 mph). If you look at a google maps of 12074 N. 135th Place, you will also notice that the houses would have shielded the wind. 

Also, while I couldn't find any reference material online regarding wind speeds a Taser will work, according to Taser's own promotional material, a Taser is more effective than pepper spray, even with a cross-wind: 

Pepper spray can only help you if you let the person come closer. But what if there is a cross-wind? What if the person closes their eyes when you are about to spray them? A TASER C2 ECD gives you 30 seconds of incapacitation power (read: knock them down for 30 thirty seconds) from a distance of up to 15 feet. This means you can protect yourself from a distance AND have time to get away.

(Pepper Spray vs. TASER ECDs Possible Inadvertent Exposure or Incapacitation from a Distance)

While that does not necessarily mean a Taser would have worked to subdue Jason Prostrollo, it does mean Scottsdale Police equating the effectiveness of Taser and pepper spray in windy conditions is nonsense. In fact, Scottsdale PD's own press release did not mention windy conditions ("Officer Involved Shooting"). 

I also find the fact Scottsdale Police stating Lt. Bayne is a 19 year veteran very troubling. It almost sounds as if Scottsdale PD wants the public to give Lt. Bayne the benefit of the doubt just because he has been on the job so long.

But shouldn't more be expected of a veteran officer, not less? If wind was an issue, why wasn't that mentioned in the Scottsdale Police press release? A man only armed with a stick is dead, killed by hands of the Scottsdale Police Department. Scottsdale PD now seems to be claiming the very experienced officer had no choice but to shoot and kill because of the wind. But what wind?

P.S. I saw on twitter that the Scottsdale Police Department is making a big fuss of the fact one of its police dogs was injured in the incident and is now recovering:

Looks like our K9 "Raider" is going to be ok. Great doctors and kudos to PMT for the lifesaving ride to the hospital. http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/Police/newsPIO/Officer_Involved_Shooting_13836

I can only hope Scottsdale Police gives at least the same amount of attention to the circumstances of Sgt. Prostrollo's death as they do to the well-being of a dog. I also spoke to a former Phoenix officer who told me Scottsdale Police has a reputation of overreacting with difficult suspects because they are not as experienced with these situations.  

UPDATE: 

In a sadly tepid commentary by the putatively progressive columnist E. J. Montini, he noted that the wife of Sen. John McCain, Cindy McCain, tweeted that Sgt. Prostrollo was a "veteran and patriot". Unfortunately, Mrs. McCain's gracious tweet was immediately criticized by: 

Jim Nolan, president of the Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police, sent a letter to Cindy McCain by way of her husband's office that reads in part, "In spite of the terror experienced by the three victims and the danger that Mr. Prostrollo placed upon our civil servants, for some reason you, Mrs. McCain, chose to take to a social media outlet and express your concern for the suspect. You did not express any sadness for the kidnapping victim, for the residents who were terrified in their own home or for the brave officers who ran towards danger while a city slept."

("Marine, vet, patriot ... and threat")

In response, Mrs. McCain sadly deleted her tweet. Please join me by asking Mrs. McCain to resend that simple, wonderful tweet. Her avatar on twitter is @CindyhM1 , also please ask Sen. John McCain (@SenJohnMcCain) to issue a statement calling for an "honest and full investigation" into the death of Sgt. Prostrollo. Finally, please ask the Scottsdale Fraternal Order of Police (@scottsdalefop35) to call Sgt. Protrollo what he was: a veteran and a patriot.  If this is all too complicated, you can simply retweet my tweets at https://twitter.com/#!/vlga

Or you can call Sen. McCain's office at (202) 224-2235.  Simply ask why should the death of taliban and terrorists get more attention than the death of a US Marine? 

The McCain's children are Brophy graduates and a son is a US Marine who served overseas. 

Continue Reading